Best First Approach
Local jurisdictions use pavement management systems to assess and prioritize their roadways. The systems are designed to guide investments to a “Best First” approach, recognizing that regular maintenance is much more cost effective than allowing a roadway to deteriorate and then rebuilding it. The backlog of deteriorated roadways, however, make it necessary for some funding to be directed to rebuilding roads.
Read more about the benefits of regular maintenance....
What the Future Holds
Local governments rate pavement on a scale of 1 to 100, with 100 being brand new roadways. While the cities and county all have slightly different ways to inventory and rate pavement condition, in general, poor pavement has a rating of 0 to around 40 or 50. Fair pavement has a rating of 40 or 50 to 60 or 70. And good and very good pavement ratings are over 60 to 70. Today, the average pavement rating of all roadways in the County is 76. In ten years or so, local staff estimate that it will drop to 36. This means we’re losing ground each year, and while roadway condition deteriorates, the backlog of unfunded and costly rehabilitation projects grows.
Sources of Funding
Sources of funding for pavement maintenance include:
- general government budgets
- local transportation benefit districts
- property tax
- state motor vehicle fuel tax
- federal gas tax, among others
Over the last few decades, caps on property tax, changes in fuel tax distribution of new funding (such as the Connecting Washington package), and rising costs of maintenance have led to an acute shortfall in maintenance funding necessary just to keep roadways in their current condition.
Local governments have responded by passing Transportation Benefit Districts – and increasingly, regionally allocated federal funding is being directed towards pavement maintenance - but these sources don’t generate enough funding to keep up.